From: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@dunaweb.hu>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kluo@nvidia.com, pchen@nvidia.com,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 05/25] ata: add the SW NCQ support to sata_nv for MCP51/MCP55/MCP61
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:36:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F9EFC9.9030209@dunaweb.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F9D6A8.8010809@garzik.org>
Jeff Garzik írta:
> Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jeff Garzik írta:
>>> akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
>>>> From: Kuan Luo <kluo@nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add the Software NCQ support to sata_nv.c for MCP51/MCP55/MCP61 SATA
>>>> controller. NCQ function is disable by default, you can enable it
>>>> with
>>>> 'swncq=1'. NCQ will be turned off if the drive is Maxtor on MCP51
>>>> or MCP55
>>>> rev 0xa2 platform.
>>>>
>>>> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fix]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kuan Luo <kluo@nvidia.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peer Chen <pchen@nvidia.com>
>>>> Cc: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@dunaweb.hu>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> drivers/ata/sata_nv.c | 860 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>> 1 files changed, 851 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> I finally gave this a thorough review.
>>>
>>> Overall, good work. The state transitions all seem solid. I made
>>> several minor changes and cleanups, and checked it into the
>>> 'nv-swncq' branch of
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
>>>
>>> Two hurdles before I'm ready to push upstream:
>>>
>>> * someone please verify my minor changes did not break anything; I
>>> don't have real hardware
>>
>> After reading the diff between the original and your cleaned up version
>> it seems both the change from 4 individual flags to a single integer
>> and the
>> nv_swncq_bmdma_stop() -> __ata_bmdma_stop() transition are obviously
>> correct.
>> I attached a small cleanup patch which may make one check a bit more
>> readable.
>>
>> However, can you explain this chunk below? Why isn't it needed?
>>
>> @@ -615,7 +622,6 @@ static const struct ata_port_info nv_por
>> {
>> .sht = &nv_swncq_sht,
>> .flags = ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
>> - .link_flags = ATA_LFLAG_HRST_TO_RESUME,
>> .pio_mask = NV_PIO_MASK,
>> .mwdma_mask = NV_MWDMA_MASK,
>> .udma_mask = NV_UDMA_MASK,
>
> that's a bug. fixed.
>
> I also applied your cleanup.
Thanks, but you took the wrong cleanup patch.
My original, i.e. this chunk below is wrong.
@@ -2291,8
<http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git;a=blob;f=drivers/ata/sata_nv.c;h=540f218e10e56c8a85a937bc920a5d96434bcc8f;hb=41f0f8af3edfccd58b5c9d714928d773a072b693#l2291>
+2283,7
<http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git;a=blob;f=drivers/ata/sata_nv.c;h=ffd00f5c533d7b58dde67cfef7d2191ca15ea140;hb=5a5a9e1890b8260686218a68862d880daee1a817#l2283>
@@ static void nv_swncq_host_interrupt(struct ata_port *ap, u16 fis)
*/
pp->dhfis_bits |= (0x1 << pp->last_issue_tag);
pp->ncq_flags |= ncq_saw_d2h;
- if ((pp->ncq_flags & ncq_saw_sdb) ||
- (pp->ncq_flags & ncq_saw_backout)) {
+ if (pp->ncq_flags & (ncq_saw_sdb || ncq_saw_backout)) {
ata_ehi_push_desc(ehi, "illegal fis transaction");
ehi->err_mask |= AC_ERR_HSM;
ehi->action |= ATA_EH_HARDRESET;
It should be a binary OR between the flags. This caused immediate
NCQ errors upon boot and lead to disabling NCQ.
My second patch has it corrected.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-26 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 20:59 [patch 05/25] ata: add the SW NCQ support to sata_nv for MCP51/MCP55/MCP61 akpm
2007-09-20 22:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-21 5:54 ` Zoltan Boszormenyi
2007-09-21 8:04 ` Zoltan Boszormenyi
2007-09-26 3:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-26 5:36 ` Zoltan Boszormenyi [this message]
2007-09-26 5:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-26 5:46 ` Zoltan Boszormenyi
2007-09-27 6:12 ` Kuan Luo
2007-09-27 6:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-27 6:56 ` Kuan Luo
2007-09-27 7:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-27 7:33 ` Kuan Luo
2007-09-27 8:54 ` Kuan Luo
2007-10-04 6:31 ` Peer Chen
2007-10-12 21:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-14 12:29 ` Kuan Luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46F9EFC9.9030209@dunaweb.hu \
--to=zboszor@dunaweb.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=kluo@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pchen@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).