From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@dunaweb.hu>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kluo@nvidia.com, pchen@nvidia.com,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 05/25] ata: add the SW NCQ support to sata_nv for MCP51/MCP55/MCP61
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:38:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F9F05F.40905@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F9EFC9.9030209@dunaweb.hu>
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> Jeff Garzik írta:
>> Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Jeff Garzik írta:
>>>> akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
>>>>> From: Kuan Luo <kluo@nvidia.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Add the Software NCQ support to sata_nv.c for MCP51/MCP55/MCP61 SATA
>>>>> controller. NCQ function is disable by default, you can enable it
>>>>> with
>>>>> 'swncq=1'. NCQ will be turned off if the drive is Maxtor on MCP51
>>>>> or MCP55
>>>>> rev 0xa2 platform.
>>>>>
>>>>> [akpm@linux-foundation.org: build fix]
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kuan Luo <kluo@nvidia.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Peer Chen <pchen@nvidia.com>
>>>>> Cc: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@dunaweb.hu>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> drivers/ata/sata_nv.c | 860 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> 1 files changed, 851 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> I finally gave this a thorough review.
>>>>
>>>> Overall, good work. The state transitions all seem solid. I made
>>>> several minor changes and cleanups, and checked it into the
>>>> 'nv-swncq' branch of
>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
>>>>
>>>> Two hurdles before I'm ready to push upstream:
>>>>
>>>> * someone please verify my minor changes did not break anything; I
>>>> don't have real hardware
>>>
>>> After reading the diff between the original and your cleaned up version
>>> it seems both the change from 4 individual flags to a single integer
>>> and the
>>> nv_swncq_bmdma_stop() -> __ata_bmdma_stop() transition are obviously
>>> correct.
>>> I attached a small cleanup patch which may make one check a bit more
>>> readable.
>>>
>>> However, can you explain this chunk below? Why isn't it needed?
>>>
>>> @@ -615,7 +622,6 @@ static const struct ata_port_info nv_por
>>> {
>>> .sht = &nv_swncq_sht,
>>> .flags = ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
>>> - .link_flags = ATA_LFLAG_HRST_TO_RESUME,
>>> .pio_mask = NV_PIO_MASK,
>>> .mwdma_mask = NV_MWDMA_MASK,
>>> .udma_mask = NV_UDMA_MASK,
>>
>> that's a bug. fixed.
>>
>> I also applied your cleanup.
>
> Thanks, but you took the wrong cleanup patch.
> My original, i.e. this chunk below is wrong.
>
> @@ -2291,8
> <http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git;a=blob;f=drivers/ata/sata_nv.c;h=540f218e10e56c8a85a937bc920a5d96434bcc8f;hb=41f0f8af3edfccd58b5c9d714928d773a072b693#l2291>
> +2283,7
> <http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git;a=blob;f=drivers/ata/sata_nv.c;h=ffd00f5c533d7b58dde67cfef7d2191ca15ea140;hb=5a5a9e1890b8260686218a68862d880daee1a817#l2283>
> @@ static void nv_swncq_host_interrupt(struct ata_port *ap, u16 fis)
> */
> pp->dhfis_bits |= (0x1 << pp->last_issue_tag);
> pp->ncq_flags |= ncq_saw_d2h;
> - if ((pp->ncq_flags & ncq_saw_sdb) ||
> - (pp->ncq_flags & ncq_saw_backout)) {
> + if (pp->ncq_flags & (ncq_saw_sdb || ncq_saw_backout)) {
> ata_ehi_push_desc(ehi, "illegal fis transaction");
> ehi->err_mask |= AC_ERR_HSM;
> ehi->action |= ATA_EH_HARDRESET;
>
> It should be a binary OR between the flags. This caused immediate
> NCQ errors upon boot and lead to disabling NCQ.
> My second patch has it corrected.
fixed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-26 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 20:59 [patch 05/25] ata: add the SW NCQ support to sata_nv for MCP51/MCP55/MCP61 akpm
2007-09-20 22:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-21 5:54 ` Zoltan Boszormenyi
2007-09-21 8:04 ` Zoltan Boszormenyi
2007-09-26 3:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-26 5:36 ` Zoltan Boszormenyi
2007-09-26 5:38 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-09-26 5:46 ` Zoltan Boszormenyi
2007-09-27 6:12 ` Kuan Luo
2007-09-27 6:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-27 6:56 ` Kuan Luo
2007-09-27 7:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-27 7:33 ` Kuan Luo
2007-09-27 8:54 ` Kuan Luo
2007-10-04 6:31 ` Peer Chen
2007-10-12 21:15 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-14 12:29 ` Kuan Luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46F9F05F.40905@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=kluo@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pchen@nvidia.com \
--cc=zboszor@dunaweb.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).