From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] blacklist NCQ on Seagate Barracuda ST380817AS Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:59:45 -0400 Message-ID: <46FFC7F1.6080409@garzik.org> References: <20070930160548.235be972@localhost> <20070930152908.1f58d39d@the-village.bc.nu> <20070930164610.20818867@localhost> <46FFBB2D.6060004@garzik.org> <20070930172859.7fd44eab@localhost> <46FFC42A.9080300@garzik.org> <20070930175207.5bfa89a8@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:38428 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756893AbXI3P7s (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:59:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070930175207.5bfa89a8@localhost> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Ornati Cc: Alan Cox , Tejun Heo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Paolo Ornati wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:43:38 -0400 > Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> it isn't supported here: >>> sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA >> Did you actually try my suggestion? > > Yes ("libata.fua=1" is ok I think, or it should just be "libata.fua"?): > ... > [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: root=/dev/sda6 ro vga=0x305 libata.fua=1 > ... > [ 285.004166] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen > ... Is libata built into the kernel, or a module? If it is a module, using the kernel command line won't work. Jeff