From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Integrate ACPI-based PATA/SATA hotplug - version 4 Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:23:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4702B6C5.2070903@garzik.org> References: <46F3322D.5090407@gmail.com> <20070921025734.GA6434@srcf.ucam.org> <46F33597.1000307@gmail.com> <20070921031245.GA6628@srcf.ucam.org> <46F33824.6000707@gmail.com> <20070924231436.GA32119@srcf.ucam.org> <47025E09.1030803@garzik.org> <20071002184958.GC31251@srcf.ucam.org> <47029423.6030605@garzik.org> <4702AC3B.2010004@garzik.org> <20071002212028.GA967@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071002212028.GA967@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , kristen.c.accardi@intel.com List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Matthew Garrett wrote: > Fix libata-acpi.c build failure. > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett > > --- > > Sorry, I'd diffed the original against libata-dev master rather than > ALL. This tidies up the changes. I had to yank the patch. For bisect-ability, we really really want to avoid pushing patches upstream that don't build; so, please resend a fixed version. BTW, you generally want to diff against libata-dev.git#upstream. 'upstream' branch is always what is queued for the next kernel release. 'ALL' is a meta-branch that includes #upstream, but also other stuff we want in -mm for testing. Jeff