From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [patch 01/10] pata_acpi: restore driver Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:16:01 -0400 Message-ID: <47040691.7080302@garzik.org> References: <200710022052.l92Kqx0w021673@imap1.linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:34916 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751532AbXJCVQE (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2007 17:16:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200710022052.l92Kqx0w021673@imap1.linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Alan Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, htejun@gmail.com akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ a/drivers/ata/pata_acpi.c > @@ -0,0 +1,403 @@ > +/* > + * ACPI PATA driver > + * > + * (c) 2007 Red Hat > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "libata-acpi.h" Just to recap the conversion in IRC, this patch contains two fatal problems: * libata-acpi.h was not included, thus it doesn't build * it depends on non-existent symbol CONFIG_SATA_ACPI (should be CONFIG_ATA_ACPI), which also means it never gets built So the ball and lyrics are back in Alan's court ;-) (or should I say submarine back in Alan's coastal waters) Jeff