From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH -stable] libata: sync NCQ blacklist with upstream Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:21:23 +0900 Message-ID: <470D96B3.3040405@gmail.com> References: <20071011015515.GQ12186@htj.dyndns.org> <20071011025734.GA30990@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.184]:11080 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755080AbXJKDVd (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:21:33 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so368525rvb for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:21:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20071011025734.GA30990@kroah.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:55:15AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Synchronize NCQ blacklist with the current upstream. > > Which -stable tree is this for, 2.6.22 or 2.6.23? It's against 2.6.23. -- tejun