From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH -stable] libata: sync NCQ blacklist with upstream Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:41:46 +0900 Message-ID: <470D9B7A.10207@gmail.com> References: <20071011015515.GQ12186@htj.dyndns.org> <20071011025734.GA30990@kroah.com> <470D96B3.3040405@gmail.com> <20071011033220.GA31225@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.191]:38390 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756244AbXJKDlw (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:41:52 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so372298rvb for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:41:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20071011033220.GA31225@kroah.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:21:23PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Greg KH wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:55:15AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >>>> Synchronize NCQ blacklist with the current upstream. >>> Which -stable tree is this for, 2.6.22 or 2.6.23? >> It's against 2.6.23. > > Ok, but things only go into -stable after they are already in Linus's > tree, which hasn't happened yet... > > So what is considered "upstream" here? Jeff's tree? Yeah, except for one entry, all others are in libata-dev#upstream which will be pulled when -rc1 opens. I'll ping you back when they actually get merged. -- tejun