From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Paprocki <andrew@ishiboo.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Bruce Allen <ballen@gravity.phys.uwm.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH #upstream 2/2] libata: track SLEEP state and issue SRST to wake it up
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:55:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4710CE58.9060903@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76366b180710122157s506fd467m10181ceca7badf6f@mail.gmail.com>
Andrew Paprocki wrote:
> Tejun,
>
> I'm able to break my system using this patch. I had a hunch this might
> be possible.. :) In short, if you issue a sleep command while the
> drive is already sleeping, it puts libata into an infinite loop
> resetting the port. I've illustrated the working test and the evil
> hunch below. The sleep command itself will need a short-circuit out of
> this logic in order to prevent this loop.
Heh... I guess you're much better a software engineer than I am. Thanks
for finding it out. It was stupid of me. :-)
> Also, in the working case below the hddtemp command actually blocked
> until the drive was spun up before returning a valid temp. While
> testing, I was able to get hddtemp to trigger the drive wake-up when
> it was sleeping, but hddtemp then returned stating the drive was
> sleeping. Re-running hddtemp until the drive was fully spun up
> (another 5 seconds) kept returning that it was sleeping. I'll see if I
> can reproduce this reliably. Am I correct in assuming the process
> which triggers the wake-up should block?
Yeah, it should. I'll test with hddtemp myself.
Jeff, please forget about this patchset. I'll re-post updated version.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-13 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-12 11:56 [PATCH #upstream 1/2] libata: move command post processing to __ata_qc_complete() Tejun Heo
2007-10-12 11:56 ` [PATCH #upstream 2/2] libata: track SLEEP state and issue SRST to wake it up Tejun Heo
2007-10-13 4:57 ` Andrew Paprocki
2007-10-13 13:55 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-10-14 1:02 ` Andrew Paprocki
2007-10-12 12:13 ` [PATCH #upstream 1/2] libata: move command post processing to __ata_qc_complete() Jeff Garzik
2007-10-13 13:09 ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-18 1:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-18 3:55 ` Bruce Allen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4710CE58.9060903@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@ishiboo.com \
--cc=ballen@gravity.phys.uwm.edu \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).