From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergei Shtylyov Subject: Re: Fwd: CMD 64x regression from 2.6.21 to 2.6.22 and 2.6.23? Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:14:56 +0400 Message-ID: <4713A010.3080504@ru.mvista.com> References: <200710142211.03382.marogge@onlinehome.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:10485 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755181AbXJOROp (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:14:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200710142211.03382.marogge@onlinehome.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Rogge Cc: bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Martin Rogge wrote: > Hi Sergei and Bartlomiej, > > I have read in the changelog that both of you got linux kernel patches into > 2.6.22-rc1 for the cmd64x driver. I found that some patches introduced in > 2.6.22-rc1 break the CMD648 operation of one of my machines. (Actually I > discovered it in 2.6.23 but since then verified that the fatal change was > introduced between 2.6.21 and 2.6.22-rc1.) > Your 2.6.22-rc1 patches may not be responsible for my problem. Nonetheless, > could you take a look? If you need any additional info, or need me to try > something out, please let me know. Could you git-bisect this? Although I have a couple of patch suspects (dealing with interrupts), all worked fine with PCI-649 just fine. PCI-648 is not really much different from 649 according to specs... > Below I copied the mail I sent to lkml a few days ago. So far I have received > no reaction. I'm not reading LKML, so CC your further mails to linux-ide@vger.kernel.org... WBR, Sergei