From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Favrholdt Subject: Re: Bug is fixed in 2.6.23.1: sata_promise: port is slow to respond, reset failed Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:55:29 +0200 Message-ID: <4713A991.3030308@how.dk> References: <200710150821.l9F8LHdS025458@harpo.it.uu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:43095 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755538AbXJORzd (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:55:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200710150821.l9F8LHdS025458@harpo.it.uu.se> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hi Mikael Pettersson wrote: > However, I don't see how the sata_promise changes from 2.6.22 to 2.6.23 > can explain this. The only functional changes there are a critical fix > for FastTrack TX4200 (not your card), and support for SATA hotplugging > (not happening here). > > So I'm suspecting something in libata core might have changed to fix this. > > Just to make sure, what's the numerical PCI IDs for your card? 01:08.0 0180: 105a:3d17 (rev 02) Subsystem: 105a:3d17 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 72, IRQ 19 I/O ports at a400 [size=128] I/O ports at a800 [size=256] Memory at e9024000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] Memory at e9000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K] [virtual] Expansion ROM at 300a0000 [disabled] [size=32K] Capabilities: [60] Power Management version 2 Best regards, Peter