From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH -stable] libata: sync NCQ blacklist with upstream Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:33:57 +0900 Message-ID: <47181795.8030705@gmail.com> References: <20071011015515.GQ12186@htj.dyndns.org> <20071011025734.GA30990@kroah.com> <470D96B3.3040405@gmail.com> <20071011033220.GA31225@kroah.com> <470D9B7A.10207@gmail.com> <20071011035553.GA31615@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.232]:30282 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763534AbXJSCeI (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:34:08 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 36so321779wra for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:34:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20071011035553.GA31615@kroah.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:41:46PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Greg KH wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 12:21:23PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >>>> Greg KH wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 10:55:15AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >>>>>> Synchronize NCQ blacklist with the current upstream. >>>>> Which -stable tree is this for, 2.6.22 or 2.6.23? >>>> It's against 2.6.23. >>> Ok, but things only go into -stable after they are already in Linus's >>> tree, which hasn't happened yet... >>> >>> So what is considered "upstream" here? Jeff's tree? >> Yeah, except for one entry, all others are in libata-dev#upstream which >> will be pulled when -rc1 opens. I'll ping you back when they actually >> get merged. > > Thanks, that would help out a lot. Alright, those changes are in Linus's tree now. Thanks. -- tejun