linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Torsten Kaiser <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com>
Cc: "Ip, Clarence" <CIP@harris.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com
Subject: Re: FW: LIBATA issue with SATA drive
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:05:53 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47183B31.4080002@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64bb37e0710182151j6992cde3u4f9ae60aa70e22eb@mail.gmail.com>

Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On 10/19/07, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>>> I'm currently using 2.6.23-mm1 and 16 boots where all good.
>>> (Apart from the unrelated failure with sata_nv and swncq...)
>> I see, a different issue then.  It's just weird to see similar issues
>> popping up now after allterm the time sata_sil24 has been around.
> 
> Just remebered another thing about sata_sil24 that popped up with 2.6.23-mm1.
> With this kernel version (comparing to 2.6.23-rc8-mm1) the port
> probing time goes up from ~0.5 seconds per port/drive to ~2 seconds.
> Also the SControl changed:
> 
> 2.6.23-rc8-mm1:
> [    4.110000] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> 2.6.23-mm1:
> [    5.930000] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 0)
> 
> But except for increased delay during boot no errors can seen, the
> drives work normally.

Yeah, PARTIAL / SLUMBER mode restriction is lifted.  Dunno whether 
that's related to the increased delay tho.  Will investigate.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-19  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-17 16:13 FW: LIBATA issue with SATA drive Ip, Clarence
2007-10-18  4:09 ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-18 18:52   ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-10-19  1:13     ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-19  1:32       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-19  2:36         ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-19  4:51       ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-10-19  5:05         ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-10-19 16:21           ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-10-23  2:58             ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47183B31.4080002@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=CIP@harris.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=just.for.lkml@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).