linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Kalra Ashish-B00888 <ashish.kalra@freescale.com>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PMP device port link speed issues
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:25:51 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47206F2F.4020206@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2A6F278C5B66C4459AF4013E77A40CD301003114@zin33exm20.fsl.freescale.net>

Kalra Ashish-B00888 wrote:
> While testing the "sata_fsl" driver with a Sil3726 based PMP, we had a
> specific configuration where the host port to PMP link speed was
> 1.5Gbps, while the PMP has configured it's device port(s) link speed to
> 3Gbps. This configuration causes NCQ hangs on certain Seagate drives,
> probably because of the link speed difference between host and PMP
> device & PMP device ports and drives.
>  
> Does it makes sense to limit the PMP device port link speeds to the host
> port link speed ? 
>  
> I believe currently sata_pmp_attach() is calling sata_link_init_spd()
> for each PMP device port and thus causing PMP device port link speeds
> being configured independent of host port link speed. Probably the PMP
> device port links should be limited to the host link speed. 

Interesting question.  I'm sure Tejun will chime in, but I'm wondering 
if there is any real use -- even theoretical -- for running downstream 
links faster than the host<->PMP link?

	Jeff





  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-25 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-25 10:18 PMP device port link speed issues Kalra Ashish-B00888
2007-10-25 10:25 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-10-26  2:45   ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-29 13:59     ` Kalra Ashish-B00888
2007-10-29 23:20       ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-30  3:58       ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47206F2F.4020206@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@freescale.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).