From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: western digital WD1500ADFD: spurious completions during NCQ Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:10:43 +0900 Message-ID: <47257963.3070203@gmail.com> References: <1192651110.6103.61.camel@thog> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]:28359 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbXJ2GKw (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:10:52 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1976225wah for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:10:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1192651110.6103.61.camel@thog> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garrett Cc: lkml , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garrett wrote: > Several threads that suggest this message is related to poor NCQ > support, but I did not see any for this drive. It's a Western Digital > WD1500ADFD-00NLR1. Is this the same thing, and should this drive be > blacklisted? How reproducible is the problem? -- tejun