From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Sabourenkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc1] sata_promise: ASIC PRD table bug workaround Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:22:16 +0300 Message-ID: <4726F7C8.3010901@lxnt.info> References: <200710300907.l9U97eW8024996@harpo.it.uu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.lxnt.info ([217.23.143.142]:65453 "EHLO mail.lxnt.info" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756662AbXJ3JWH (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:22:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200710300907.l9U97eW8024996@harpo.it.uu.se> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > Unfortunately the name pdc_qc_prep() is already taken > [it switches on qc->tf.protocol], so that leaves either pdc_fill_sg() > [slightly imprecise as you noted], or uglies like __pdc_qc_prep(), > pdc_qc_prep2(), or pdc_qc_prep_and_fill_sg() as names for the new > procedure. I welcome suggestions for a better name. > pdc_qc_prep_backend() ? ps: I almost stuck on naming the function while writing the patch, put there first that came to mind just to not delay testing. -- ./lxnt