From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: SATA_SIL Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:11:04 +0900 Message-ID: <472A7928.2060702@gmail.com> References: <1193781389.26314.9.camel@ws1.fransdb.nl> <4729126F.1000108@gmail.com> <1193955948.17609.31.camel@ws1.fransdb.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.179]:12161 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754046AbXKBBLN (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 21:11:13 -0400 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so769145wah for ; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:11:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1193955948.17609.31.camel@ws1.fransdb.nl> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Frans de Boer Cc: IDE/ATA development list [restoring linux-ide, please don't drop cc] Frans de Boer wrote: > Hello sir, > > I just checked: the SuSE 2.6.22.9-0.4 source for sata_sil.c (among > others) is NOT the same as the stock 2.6.22.9. Looking at your reply, I > quess that I have to skip 2.6.23 and use the next 2.6.24 release? Is it sata_sil or sata_sil24? You were talking about sil24 in the original message. > On a more modern system, - without the sil chips - SuSE 10.3 with the > newer 2.6.23.1 kernel is working just fine. > > Do you still like to recieve my report as suggested by you? Yeah, it should just work. Thanks. -- tejun