From: Albert Lee <albertcc@tw.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "Fix ATAPI transfer lengths" causes CD writing regression
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:02:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <472D445B.1080005@tw.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <472D0D4A.70404@gmail.com>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Daniel Drake wrote:
>
>>Tejun Heo wrote:
>>
>>>><4>ata2.00: HSM violation: eh_analyze_tf: BUSY|DRQ
>>>><3>ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
>>>><3>ata2.00: cmd a0/00:00:00:0a:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 0x5a data
>>>>10 in
>>>><4> res 58/00:02:00:0a:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x2 (HSM
>>>>violation)
>>>><3>ata2.00: status: { DRDY DRQ }
>>>><6>ata2: soft resetting link
>>>><6>ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
>>>><6>ata2: EH complete
>>>
>>>Does this patch fix the problem?
>>
>>That fixes it, thanks! There is no more ugly error in dmesg, the test
>>prog doesn't print any sense data, and brasero works OK too. However,
>>these messages appear in the kernel log every time I run the test app
>>(or when brasero does its thing):
>>
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 10 bytes trailing data
>><4>ata2.00: 6 bytes trailing data
>
>
> Yeah, that's expected. What's going on here is that your drive sends
> full mode sense data (76bytes) regardless of allocation size in CDB but
> it does honor transfer chunk set in the PACKET TF, which is set to the
> same value as allocation size by Alan's patch. So, now the drive sends
> the 76 bytes in 8 chunks. The first chunk is transferred into the sg
> buffer and the following chunks are thrown away.
>
> Previously, transfer chunk was set to 8k, so the drive claims to
> transfer 76 bytes from the buegging, libata transfers leading 10 bytes
> got transferred into the user buffer and throws away what's remaining.
> The change caused problem because libata HSM always switches to
> HSM_ST_LAST (command sequence completion) after filling the command
> buffer completely. So, throwing away is activated iff the extra data to
> throw away is transfered together with the last chunk of useful data.
>
> With the chunk size reduced to allocation size, the initial chunk fills
> the data buffer completely and all the extra bytes are transfered in
> separate chunks. However, libata HSM expects command sequence to
> complete after the initial chunk but the drive asserts DRQ for the next
> chunk on the following interrupt, so HSM violation is triggered.
>
> The patch modifies HSM such that it keeps throwing away extra data as
> long as the drive asserts DRQ which is how IDE driver does it.
>
>From past experience, some dead ATAPI devices stuck in DRQ=1. We should
take care of such situation, otherwise the HSM might get into an infinite
loop of waiting for the dead ATAPI device to say DRQ=0 and discarding
endless "trailing data".
Maybe we could set a limit here. If the ATAPI device keeps DRQ=1 and
exceeds the limit, we consider it as HSM violation and have EH handle it.
--
albert
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-04 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-30 15:14 "Fix ATAPI transfer lengths" causes CD writing regression Daniel Drake
2007-10-30 15:34 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-30 17:45 ` Daniel Drake
2007-10-30 18:26 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-30 19:01 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-30 19:21 ` Daniel Drake
2007-10-31 11:49 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-31 11:57 ` Jens Axboe
2007-10-31 12:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-31 12:26 ` Jens Axboe
2007-10-31 16:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-31 16:29 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-31 16:34 ` Daniel Drake
2007-10-31 17:55 ` Jens Axboe
2007-11-01 0:40 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-01 7:24 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-01 10:50 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-31 12:49 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-01 9:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-01 10:53 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-01 11:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-01 14:15 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-01 15:33 ` Daniel Drake
2007-11-01 15:57 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-01 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-01 16:04 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-02 21:19 ` Daniel Drake
2007-11-03 1:17 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-03 12:34 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-11-03 20:02 ` Daniel Drake
2007-11-04 0:07 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-04 4:02 ` Albert Lee [this message]
2007-11-04 23:42 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-05 0:05 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-05 13:03 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-06 10:18 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-06 12:48 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-05 0:15 ` Daniel Drake
2007-11-02 17:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-30 16:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-30 16:10 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=472D445B.1080005@tw.ibm.com \
--to=albertcc@tw.ibm.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=albertl@mail.com \
--cc=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).