From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] ide: remove hwif->intrproc Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:08:24 +0900 Message-ID: <4732EE28.5030700@gmail.com> References: <200710310055.13329.bzolnier@gmail.com> <4728F05A.5000502@ru.mvista.com> <47325DA0.4070905@rtr.ca> <473277E1.5000500@gmail.com> <20071108103943.GA8425@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]:9441 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758339AbXKHLId (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 06:08:33 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so158290wah for ; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 03:08:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20071108103943.GA8425@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Mark Lord , Sergei Shtylyov , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Albert Lee Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:43:45AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> I believe I have a small PCI card here with an HPT366 chip on it. >>> Does anyone there want it before I throw it away? >> I already have a 372. It should be almost the same, right? > > They are not very similar no. HPT37x is a progression from the 366 > but quite different Alright, then, if no one else wants it, please send it to me. I can pay for the shipping via paypal. :-) -- tejun