From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: linux-ata.org contributions Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:18:31 +0900 Message-ID: <4737A9E7.5010200@gmail.com> References: <47362C63.7080108@garzik.org> <47362C9B.6090809@garzik.org> <20071110230324.3647cdf5@the-village.bc.nu> <4736395D.1080102@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]:13200 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752939AbXKLBSo (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Nov 2007 20:18:44 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so1359021wah for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:18:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4736395D.1080102@garzik.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Alan Cox , IDE/ATA development list , Albert Lee Jeff Garzik wrote: > I wouldn't push it out unless it looked OK in my browser. > > But overall I tend to dislike wikis. They enable collaboration, but > tend to be uniformly ugly, cumbersome, and CPU intensive. Besides collaboration, one thing I like about wikis is that updating the page is an one-step process. You can just go there and edit things directly and pages are updated and history is recorded immediately. Compared to normal web pages where you have to go through one or a few iterations of edit -> view -> check in if you wanna -> upload / send pages, it's just more efficient. Well, I also dislike editing html pages directly and pages generated by openoffice is ugly. So, my preference is a wiki. I don't care which wiki it is as long as I can edit and view it directly. Thanks. -- tejun