From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gabriel C Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:58:55 +0100 Message-ID: <473B6F9F.6060404@googlemail.com> References: <20071113031553.3c7b5c16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071114133034.GR17785@parisc-linux.org> <473AF9A5.50707@suse.de> <200711141439.58200.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:28993 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751720AbXKNV7C (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:59:02 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so298654nfb for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:58:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200711141439.58200.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Denys Vlasenko Cc: Hannes Reinecke , Matthew Wilcox , Adrian Bunk , Theodore Tso , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, protasnb@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Benoit Boissinot , Mark Lord , Ingo Molnar , David Miller Denys Vlasenko wrote: > hi Matthew, > > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 06:35, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> Matthew Wilcox wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:46:20AM -0700, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >>>> Finally they replied and asked to rediff it against their >>>> git tree. I did that and sent patches back. No reply since then. >>>> >>>> And mind you, the patch is not trying to do anything >>>> complex, it mostly moves code around, removes 'inline', >>>> adds 'const'. What should I think about it? >>> I'm waiting for an ACK/NAK from Hannes, the maintainer. What should I >>> do? > > You could have informed me about this, and I would talk to Hannes > myself. This would free up your mind from keeping track of this > particular patch. > Parallelize development, prevent things from being forgotten. > > > Hi Hannes, > >> I haven't actually been able to test it here (too busy, sorry). If someone >> else confirms it does it's job then >> >> Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke > > It's not in my mailbox on this machine, gladly we have lkml archived > in the Net. Here is a positive tester report: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/15/168: > > ====================== > Date Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:53:08 +0200 > From Gabriel C <> > Subject Re: [PATCH 0/3] debloat aic7xxx and aic79xx drivers > >>> Compile tested and applies cleanly to 2.6.23. >>> I don't have this hardware anymore and cannot run test these patches. >> I can test these patches on an aic7892 controller later on today if you > want. > > Works fine for me tested on : > > 03:0e.0 SCSI storage controller [0100]: Adaptec AIC-7892P U160/m [9005:008f] > (rev 02) > > Gabriel > ======================= I still run the patches on a box with 2.6.23 and one with 2.6.24-rc1 without any problems. Didn't tested rc2/current git but I can if is needed. If you need an Tested-by.. let me know. > > -- > vda Gabriel