* sata_nv on MCP51: NCQ possible?
@ 2007-11-15 9:00 Michael Tokarev
2007-11-15 9:09 ` Michael Tokarev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tokarev @ 2007-11-15 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ide
While trying to test NCQ thing again, I come across
a problem, it seems: the only hardware available for
testing to me right now is an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard,
which is based on Nvidia nForce 430/GeForce 6150.
lspci shows this:
00:0f.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Serial ATA Controller (rev a1)
I see no command queuing enabled by linux (queue depth: 0/32),
and there's no way to enable it in sysfs, either.
Looking at sources (sata_nv.c), it seems this chipset is
marked as "GENERIC" with no ADMA/NCQ support - at least
in 2.6.23 kernel.
Does this chipset support ADMA/NCQ (just not supported in
the driver), or am I out of luck with this testing?
Thanks.
/mjt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: sata_nv on MCP51: NCQ possible?
2007-11-15 9:00 sata_nv on MCP51: NCQ possible? Michael Tokarev
@ 2007-11-15 9:09 ` Michael Tokarev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Tokarev @ 2007-11-15 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ide
[replying to myself...]
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> While trying to test NCQ thing again, I come across
> a problem, it seems: the only hardware available for
> testing to me right now is an ASUS M2NPV-VM motherboard,
> which is based on Nvidia nForce 430/GeForce 6150.
> lspci shows this:
>
> 00:0f.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Serial ATA Controller (rev a1)
>
> I see no command queuing enabled by linux (queue depth: 0/32),
> and there's no way to enable it in sysfs, either.
Hmm. When googling harder, I've found something about this,
e.g. here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg09517.html
(it's a long thread).
But some question(s) remains still.
First, it looks like that patch(set) isn't in 2.6.23. I'll grab
2.6.24pre to see if it's there.
And second, and most important -- what's "SW NCQ", or "Software NCQ"?
To me it sounds like "BIOS RAID" - that "RAID" thing found on many
modern desktop motherboards which isn't hardware raid, and hence
it does not offer any advantage over normal linux software raid
implementation (which has its own advantages anyway). So I'm
a bit confused here: linux I/O scheduler and this "Software NCQ" -
isn't one of the two redundrand? And sure thing - is it worth
to test NCQ at all if it's "Software"?
Thanks.
/mjt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-15 9:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-15 9:00 sata_nv on MCP51: NCQ possible? Michael Tokarev
2007-11-15 9:09 ` Michael Tokarev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).