From: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc3-mm1: I/O error, system hangs
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:39:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4749DD87.5020206@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195976275.3427.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Le 25.11.2007 08:37, James Bottomley a écrit :
> On Sat, 2007-11-24 at 23:59 +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
>> Le 24.11.2007 14:26, James Bottomley a écrit :
>>> OK, could you post dmesgs again, please. I actually tested this
>> with an
>>> aic79xx card, and for me it does cause Domain Validation to succeed
>>> again.
>> James,
>>
>> Here is a dmesg produced by 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 + your patch "separates
>> the
>> BLOCK and QUIESCE states
>> correctly" (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/24/8).
>>
>> How to reproduce :
>> - boot
>> - switch to a text console
>> - capture dmesg in a file, sync, etc. There are 3 I/O errors, but the
>> system does work.
>> - switch to X console, log in the Gnome Desktop, the system partially
>> hangs.
>> - switch back to a text console: dmesg(1) still works, it shows some
>> additonal I/O errors. At this point, any disk access makes the system
>> completely hung.
>>
>> Additionnal data:
>> - the I/O errors always happen on the same blocks.
>>
>> plain text document attachment (dmesg-2.6.24-rc3-mm1-patched)
> [...]
>> [ 25.521256] scsi0 : pata_via
>> [ 25.521711] scsi1 : pata_via
>> [ 25.524089] ata1: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0xb800 irq 14
>> [ 25.524176] ata2: PATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0xb808 irq 15
>> [ 25.683141] ata1.00: ATA-5: ST340016A, 3.75, max UDMA/100
>> [ 25.683208] ata1.00: 78165360 sectors, multi 16: LBA
>> [ 25.683475] ata1.01: ATA-7: Maxtor 6Y080L0, YAR41BW0, max UDMA/133
>> [ 25.684116] ata1.01: 160086528 sectors, multi 16: LBA
>> [ 25.691127] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
>> [ 25.699142] ata1.01: configured for UDMA/100
>> [ 26.170860] ata2.00: ATAPI: HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4165B, DL05, max UDMA/33
>> [ 26.171562] ata2.01: ATAPI: CD-950E/AKU, A4Q, max MWDMA2, CDB intr
>> [ 26.330839] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
>> [ 26.490828] ata2.01: configured for MWDMA2
>> [ 26.503014] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST340016A 3.75 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
>> [ 26.504670] scsi 0:0:1:0: Direct-Access ATA Maxtor 6Y080L0 YAR4 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
>> [ 26.509842] scsi 1:0:0:0: CD-ROM HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4165B DL05 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
>> [ 26.511673] scsi 1:0:1:0: CD-ROM E-IDE CD-950E/AKU A4Q PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
> [...]
>> [ 60.216113] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Result: hostbyte=DID_NO_CONNECT driverbyte=DRIVER_OK,SUGGEST_OK
>> [ 60.216124] end_request: I/O error, dev sda, sector 16460
>
> I think this one's quite easy: PATA devices in libata are queue depth 1
> (since they don't do NCQ). Thus, they're peculiarly sensitive to the
> bug where we fail over queue depth requests.
>
> On the other hand, I don't see how a filesystem request is getting
> REQ_FAILFAST ... unless there's a bio or readahead issue involved.
> Anyway, could you try this patch:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=119592627425498
>
> Which should fix the queue depth issue, and see if the errors go away?
No, this one doesn't help...
--
laurent
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-25 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071120204525.ff27ac98.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <4744A6F2.4030302@free.fr>
2007-11-21 22:41 ` 2.6.24-rc3-mm1: I/O error, system hangs Andrew Morton
2007-11-23 7:29 ` Laurent Riffard
2007-11-23 7:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2007-11-23 11:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2007-11-23 17:52 ` Laurent Riffard
2007-11-24 6:42 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-24 12:57 ` Laurent Riffard
2007-11-24 13:26 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-24 17:54 ` Gabriel C
2007-11-24 18:04 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-24 18:08 ` Gabriel C
2007-11-24 18:28 ` Gabriel C
2007-11-24 22:59 ` Laurent Riffard
2007-11-25 7:37 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-25 20:39 ` Laurent Riffard [this message]
2007-11-28 21:38 ` Laurent Riffard
2007-11-24 17:44 ` James Bottomley
2007-11-26 7:54 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4749DD87.5020206@free.fr \
--to=laurent.riffard@free.fr \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).