From: Richard Scobie <r.scobie@clear.net.nz>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SAS v SATA interface performance
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 08:19:54 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4751B3DA.6030508@clear.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87f94c370712010637o5efa9c4rd9a86ec5a3cba6ff@mail.gmail.com>
Greg Freemyer wrote:
> Also, if you have Port Multiplexers (PMPs) in use, that would be
> interesting to know. I don't even know if PMPs are supported via SAS
> controllers in 2.6.24 or not. ie. PMP support is new to 2.6.24 and
> only a few Sata controllers will have PMP support in 2.6.24.
No, port multipliers are not in use here, the technology that SAS uses
is called port expansion. While I do not know much about the low level
operational differences, from a performance perspective, this is my
understanding.
Port multiplication only permits one drive to be accessed at once,
whereas port expansion allows multiple drives to be accessed simultaneously.
Port expanders are selfcontained and do not require kernel support - the
only kernel requirement, is support for the SAS HBA or RAID controller.
See Xtore, Adaptec or Dell (MD1000), for suitable JBOD enclosures.
Regards,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-01 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-30 19:19 SAS v SATA interface performance Richard Scobie
2007-11-30 21:24 ` Michael Tokarev
2007-11-30 23:17 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-01 7:43 ` Richard Scobie
2007-12-01 14:37 ` Greg Freemyer
2007-12-01 19:19 ` Richard Scobie [this message]
2007-12-01 20:01 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-01 20:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-12-01 23:55 ` Richard Scobie
2007-12-02 3:45 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-02 3:49 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-10 7:33 ` Tejun Heo
2007-12-10 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2007-12-10 16:28 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-10 14:50 ` James Bottomley
2007-12-10 16:32 ` Mark Lord
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-01 0:04 Richard Scobie
2007-12-01 0:17 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-01 3:06 ` Mark Lord
2007-12-10 7:15 ` Tejun Heo
2007-12-10 16:23 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4751B3DA.6030508@clear.net.nz \
--to=r.scobie@clear.net.nz \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).