From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: sata_sil issue on 2.6.22 Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:25:00 +0900 Message-ID: <4757415C.9010906@gmail.com> References: <47434526.7010304@verizonbusiness.com> <474CC29E.8020102@gmail.com> <475032AF.6090001@verizonbusiness.com> <4754C15C.1020107@gmail.com> <4756B5B2.1010302@verizonbusiness.com> <4756B6D3.9020307@gmail.com> <4756BA80.1020902@verizonbusiness.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.184]:31256 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751561AbXLFAZH (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:25:07 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so21546rvb for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:25:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4756BA80.1020902@verizonbusiness.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: mark.paulus@verizonbusiness.com Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Mark Paulus wrote: > Yes, I am. It's a SD-ADSAIDE-S1, with a sil3611ct80 chip on board. > > My question would be, what makes the 2.6.22 kernel different enough > than the 2.6.18 kernel that this setup is causing problems in .22. > Is .18 masking the problems, or is .22 just looking at things with > tighter tolerences, so it's more sensitive? That's to be investigated. There's another report of similar problem. Can you please add yourself to the following bugzilla and add your log there? http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9505 Thanks. -- tejun