From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:20:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <475CA25F.5000103@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071210004959.GA23280@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
Andreas Mohr wrote:
> As such one can conclude that this BIOS is rather very confused when being called for _GTM on an entirely
> unused controller port. And this is either because the BIOS is dumb or because ACPI doesn't really
> expect anyone to call _GTM on an unused physical port. I'd bet on the latter...
> (however I haven't found ACPI 3.0b explicitly mentioning this somewhere yet)
Thanks a lot for finding this out. One of the two reports in bug 9320
seems to be the same problem although the other doesn't seem to be. So,
it seems we'll have to check that both primary and secondary slots are
empty and skip _GTM if so. :-(
Also, right, there's no need to fail suspend on _GTM failure whatever
the error is. That was me being anal again. Will incorporate both into
the ACPI fixes patchset.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-10 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.qQhD8aJpiTOFaZqjRYwoaG7YT1c@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.yaP86AixGhz5Q7eXSu04pIQp6ho@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.c3k8VKWAx4HIo9zXWbL5Ek0oSBw@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.C8ACnOhs8bXB++vmugf5F34JcJg@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.5o6E6S0UWnARbQPxLe30TvLQIiY@ifi.uio.no>
2007-12-08 18:24 ` 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Robert Hancock
2007-12-09 5:59 ` Tejun Heo
2007-12-09 21:36 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-12-10 0:04 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-12-10 0:49 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-12-10 1:28 ` Robert Hancock
2007-12-10 2:25 ` Tejun Heo
2007-12-10 3:20 ` Robert Hancock
2007-12-10 2:20 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
[not found] <200712080340.49546.rjw@sisk.pl>
2007-12-08 9:36 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-08 10:12 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-12-08 10:20 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-08 10:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-12-08 10:55 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-12-09 15:46 ` Tejun Heo
2007-12-09 19:59 ` Andreas Mohr
2007-12-09 6:52 ` Tejun Heo
2007-12-09 14:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-09 15:11 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=475CA25F.5000103@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).