From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: question about SATA vs (SATA via USB) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 17:40:03 +0900 Message-ID: <47721363.9050601@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.186]:30779 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753695AbXLZL2b (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:28:31 -0500 Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k20so2212768rvb.1 for ; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 03:28:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Harri Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Harri wrote: > Next I mounted (rw, shame on me) the old SATA disk via USB > to the PC, and tried to copy the data. But during the copy > there were some syslog messages about file system corruptions > on the old disk. I stopped rsync, unmounted the disk, > and ran fsck, but it was damaged beyond repair. No chance > to recover any data. Hmmm... interesting. That isn't supposed to happen. Do you have kernel logs saved? -- tejun