From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: SATA kernel-buffered read VERY slow (not raid, Promise TX300 card); 2.6.23.1(vanilla) Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:56:31 -0600 Message-ID: <477DA05F.4080503@shaw.ca> References: <477D9B6E.7060000@shaw.ca> <477D9D66.3080502@tlinx.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca ([24.71.223.10]:32502 "EHLO pd3mo1so.prod.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754015AbYADC5Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jan 2008 21:57:25 -0500 In-reply-to: <477D9D66.3080502@tlinx.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Linda Walsh Cc: LKML , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Linda Walsh wrote: > Robert Hancock wrote: >> >> Looks like the drive reports ERR/ABRT (command aborted), meaning it >> likely doesn't support those commands. >> > --- > Except the PATA version of the drive does (same capacity, & other > specs). Seagate would > disable "advanced" features for SATA but leave them for the older > technology? Possible, > but doesn't seem likely. If this is a Seagate, I believe that they don't have AAM enabled on any of their newer drives (something about a lawsuit for patent infringement on that feature, or something). Quite likely they don't support that power management command, either.