linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* USB ohci vs ehci
@ 2005-06-27 21:49 Jim Ramsay
  2005-06-27 22:04 ` Jim Ramsay
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jim Ramsay @ 2005-06-27 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ide

I have an NEC-based 'UP215-N101' USB 2.0 PCI card which can apparently
appear as a device under ohci-hcd or ehci-hcd, depending on which one
is loaded.  If both modules are loaded, the device doesn't seem to
work, as it is detected by both

I would just load the ehci-hcd device, except that the on-board USB is
only detected by ohci-hcd.

Is there some way to make ohci-hcd ignore a specific PCI device or
devices?  Or is there a way ehci-hcd can tell ohci-hcd to 'forget'
about a particular device if it exists in ehci-hcd as well?

Output of `dmesg` after loading ohci-hcd.  The card in question is at
pci 0000:00:10

ohci_hcd 0000:00:01.3: PCI device 1283:1234 (Integrated Technology Express, Inc.
)                                                                               
ohci_hcd 0000:00:01.3: irq 35, pci mem 0xd020000                                
ohci_hcd 0000:00:01.3: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1            
hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found                                                      
hub 1-0:1.0: 2 ports detected                                                   
ohci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: NEC Corporation USB                                      
ohci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: irq 40, pci mem 0xd021000                                
ohci_hcd 0000:00:10.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2            
hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found                                                      
hub 2-0:1.0: 3 ports detected                                                   
ohci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: NEC Corporation USB (#2)                                 
ohci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: irq 40, pci mem 0xd022000                                
ohci_hcd 0000:00:10.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3            
hub 3-0:1.0: USB hub found                                                      
hub 3-0:1.0: 2 ports detected

Output of `dmesg` after loading ehci-hcd:

ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: NEC Corporation USB 2.0                                  
ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: irq 40, pci mem 0xd024000                                
ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 4            
ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: park 0                                                   
ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.2: USB 2.0 initialized, EHCI 1.00, driver 10 Dec 2004       
hub 4-0:1.0: USB hub found                                                      
hub 4-0:1.0: 5 ports detected            

Output of `lspci -vv -s 10`:

00:10.0 Class 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 43) (prog-if 10)                             
        Subsystem: 3083:0035                                                    
        Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Step
ping- SERR+ FastB2B-                                                            
        Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort
- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-                                                        
        Latency: 252 (250ns min, 10500ns max), cache line size 08               
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 40                                       
        Region 0: Memory at 0d021000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]       
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2                           
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot
+,D3cold-)                                                                      
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-                     
                                                                                
00:10.1 Class 0c03: 1033:0035 (rev 43) (prog-if 10)                             
        Subsystem: 3083:0035                                                    
        Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Step
ping- SERR+ FastB2B-                                                            
        Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort
- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-                                                        
        Latency: 252 (250ns min, 10500ns max), cache line size 08               
        Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 40                                       
        Region 0: Memory at 0d022000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]       
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2                           
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot
+,D3cold-)                                                                      
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-                     
                                                                                
00:10.2 Class 0c03: 1033:00e0 (rev 04) (prog-if 20)                             
        Subsystem: 3083:00e0                                                    
        Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Step
ping- SERR+ FastB2B-                                                            
        Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort
- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR-                                                        
        Latency: 252 (4000ns min, 8500ns max), cache line size 08               
        Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 40                                       
        Region 0: Memory at 0d024000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]      
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 2                           
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1+ D2+ AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0+,D1+,D2+,D3hot
+,D3cold-)                                                                      
                Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-     

-- 
Jim Ramsay
"Me fail English?  That's unpossible!"

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: USB ohci vs ehci
  2005-06-27 21:49 USB ohci vs ehci Jim Ramsay
@ 2005-06-27 22:04 ` Jim Ramsay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jim Ramsay @ 2005-06-27 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ide

My apologies.  I've sent this off to linux-kernel list instead. 
Please disregard.

-- 
Jim Ramsay
"Me fail English?  That's unpossible!"

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-27 22:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-27 21:49 USB ohci vs ehci Jim Ramsay
2005-06-27 22:04 ` Jim Ramsay

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).