From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Chmielewski Subject: Re: sata_mv oops on module removal Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:03:22 +0100 Message-ID: <478F8A5A.3030003@wpkg.org> References: <478F5F1C.80608@wpkg.org> <478F6DB5.4080308@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.syneticon.net ([213.239.212.131]:34720 "EHLO mail2.syneticon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751427AbYAQRD3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:03:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <478F6DB5.4080308@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Linux IDE Mark Lord schrieb: > Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >> This is what happened when I tried to remove sata_mv module: >> >> >> ACPI: PCI interrupt for device 0000:01:00.0 disabled >> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e0122028 >> printing eip: >> e0015599 >> *pde = 1f557067 >> *pte = 00000000 >> Oops: 0000 [#1] >> Modules linked in: cpufreq_ondemand p4_clockmod speedstep_lib >> iscsi_scst crc32c libcrc32c scst_vdisk scst bonding dm_mirror >> dm_snapshot sata_mv >> CPU: 0 >> EIP: 0060:[] Not tainted VLI >> EFLAGS: 00010046 (2.6.23.14-N5200-3 #8) ^^^^^^^^^ > You did not say which exact kernel version this is from. > A bug just like this was fixed not long ago. It's 2.6.23.14. I didn't find anything similar. Am I looking wrong, or was it a fix for 2.6.24? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org