From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: [PATCH 13/13] sata_mv ncq Comments and version bump Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:33:59 -0500 Message-ID: <479BC367.8070402@rtr.ca> References: <479BC217.60709@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([76.10.145.34]:1692 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752901AbYAZXeA (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:34:00 -0500 In-Reply-To: <479BC217.60709@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik , IDE/ATA development list Remove some obsolete comments, and bump up the driver version number. Signed-off-by: Mark Lord --- old/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2008-01-26 11:05:54.000000000 -0500 +++ new/drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2008-01-26 11:12:32.000000000 -0500 @@ -29,7 +29,13 @@ I distinctly remember a couple workarounds (one related to PCI-X) are still needed. - 4) Add NCQ support (easy to intermediate, once new-EH support appears) + 2) Improve/fix IRQ and error handling sequences. + + 3) ATAPI support (Marvell claims the 60xx/70xx chips can do it). + + 4) Think about TCQ support here, and for libata in general + with controllers that suppport it via host-queuing hardware + (a software-only implementation could be a nightmare). 5) Investigate problems with PCI Message Signalled Interrupts (MSI). @@ -53,8 +59,6 @@ Target mode, for those without docs, is the ability to directly connect two SATA controllers. - 13) Verify that 7042 is fully supported. I only have a 6042. - */ @@ -73,7 +77,7 @@ #include #define DRV_NAME "sata_mv" -#define DRV_VERSION "1.01" +#define DRV_VERSION "1.20" enum { /* BAR's are enumerated in terms of pci_resource_start() terms */