From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Favrholdt Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.24 sata_promise SATA300TX4 problems Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:32:52 +0100 Message-ID: <479CC044.8010401@how.dk> References: <479B0A39.2050700@how.dk> <18331.53035.493189.308501@harpo.it.uu.se> <479BD2E2.2060307@how.dk> <18331.59497.908868.283142@harpo.it.uu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:53415 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752330AbYA0Rcz (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:32:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <18331.59497.908868.283142@harpo.it.uu.se> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mikael Pettersson Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Hi Mikael, Thanks! It works perfectly at 1.5Gbps :-) I think that because it fails at 3Gbps it might eventually fail at 1.5Gbps also... And the error handling was not robust (in my setup with these drives at 3Gbps). If I can help investigate further, I'm happy to do that. I have a spare controller card so I could try swapping them. Do you have any suggestions for what I should try next? Best regards, Peter Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Peter Favrholdt writes: > > If it is not too much of a hassle, could you please make a 1.5Gbps patch > > for 2.6.24 for me to try out? If it solves the problem (without me ever > > touching the cables) we know for sure it is speed-related and not due to > > kernel version. > > No problem. I had intended to drop that patch after 2.6.24-rc8 as it > ought to be obsolete, but then again it might not be. It's available here: >