From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Cc: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Linux ide Mailing list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:29:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <479E3B27.9030402@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080128200105.GA20201@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 01:38:40PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>>> [ 31.195305] ata2.00: ATAPI: LITE-ON DVDRW SHM-165H6S, HS06, max UDMA/66
>>> [ 31.243813] ata2.01: ATA-7: MAXTOR STM3320620A, 3.AAE, max UDMA/100
>>> [ 31.243816] ata2.01: 625142448 sectors, multi 16: LBA48
>>> [ 31.243825] ata2.00: limited to UDMA/33 due to 40-wire cable
>>> [ 31.417074] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33
>>> [ 31.451769] ata2.01: configured for UDMA/100
>> ..
>>
>> That looks like an unrelated bug to me: the driver says "40-wire cable"
>> but then goes and chooses UDMA/100 on one of the drives.
>
> We currently assume that
> - If we have host side detecting 40 that we use 40
> - If we have drive side detecting 40 use 40
> - If we have drive side detecting 80 and host thinks 80 use 80
>
> The case where the drives disagree isn't currently considered.
..
Ahh. Tricky mess, that stuff.
I believe that if we have a drive that only sees 40W,
then it is probably best to restrict the other drive as well.
Just in case the drive that reports 40W cannot actually keep up
with the 80W timings, even when they're for the other drive.
That's my 2p.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-28 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200801272122.21823.gene.heskett@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <18333.36746.819935.641383@harpo.it.uu.se>
[not found] ` <1201521783.6149.33.camel@lappy>
2008-01-28 12:54 ` Problem with ata layer in 2.6.24 Gene Heskett
2008-01-28 13:19 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-28 13:57 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-01-28 16:35 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-28 16:50 ` Calvin Walton
2008-01-28 17:20 ` Zan Lynx
2008-01-28 17:30 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-28 17:44 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-28 17:59 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-28 18:23 ` Richard Heck
2008-01-28 20:01 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-29 0:05 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 0:34 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-29 1:31 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 1:51 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-29 4:48 ` Michal Jaegermann
2008-01-29 12:12 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-29 14:30 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 14:51 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 15:47 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-29 16:32 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 16:48 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-01-29 17:04 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 17:38 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-29 17:44 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-29 18:12 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-29 17:59 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 18:54 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-29 22:41 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 22:48 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-30 0:19 ` rgheck
2008-01-30 0:19 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-29 17:06 ` rgheck
2008-01-29 17:12 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-29 17:24 ` rgheck
2008-01-29 17:40 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-29 18:11 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-29 18:28 ` rgheck
2008-01-29 18:32 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-29 18:14 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-29 18:46 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-29 19:14 ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-29 19:34 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-28 16:56 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-28 18:20 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-28 18:59 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-28 20:43 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-29 0:06 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 3:16 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-29 4:07 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-28 17:06 ` Dave Neuer
2008-01-29 4:23 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-01-29 4:49 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 5:01 ` Kasper Sandberg
2008-02-02 7:13 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-28 14:44 ` Richard Heck
2008-01-28 17:01 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-28 18:38 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-28 20:01 ` Alan Cox
2008-01-28 20:29 ` Mark Lord [this message]
[not found] ` <479E24F7.4090502@rtr.ca>
2008-01-28 19:01 ` Mark Lord
[not found] ` <200801281404.12937.gene.heskett@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <479E399C.1030409@rtr.ca>
2008-01-28 20:32 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-28 19:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-01-28 19:13 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 6:41 ` Florian Attenberger
2008-01-29 15:04 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 16:12 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-29 16:36 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 18:09 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-29 16:50 ` rgheck
2008-01-29 16:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-01-29 17:12 ` Gene Heskett
2008-01-29 17:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-01-29 17:53 ` Gene Heskett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=479E3B27.9030402@rtr.ca \
--to=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).