From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, liml@rtr.ca,
kngregertsen@norway.atmel.com, sonic.adi@gmail.com,
rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk, alessandro.zummo@towertech.it,
domen.puncer@telargo.com, akira2.iguchi@toshiba.co.jp,
leoli@freescale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] libata: stop overloading port_info->private_data
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:07:20 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47AD0AD8.3020402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080204142658.00314213@core>
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:29:01 +0900
> Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> port_info->private_data is currently used for two purposes - to record
>> private data about the port_info or to specify host->private_data to
>> use when allocating ata_host.
>
> Sensible point, horrible implementation - I'd NAK this strongly in favour
> of switching to:
>
> ata_pci_init_one(....., private_ptr);
>
> otherwise when that glue changes we are going to keep having to fix six
> or more drivers.
That alloc-init-register sequence is now the standard initialization
sequence used by all drivers which either aren't SFF or need extra stuff
on top of SFF. ata_pci_init_one() being pretty simple at this point, I
thought the converted ones could just follow the suit instead of
updating every ata_pci_init_one() call.
Oh well, you deal with most SFF drivers anyway. I'll add "void
*host_priv" to ata_pci_init_one().
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-09 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-30 9:28 [PATCHSET libata-dev#upstream] clean up scsi_host_templates and ata_port_operations Tejun Heo
2008-01-30 9:28 ` [PATCH 1/9] libata: PCI device should be powered up before being accessed Tejun Heo
2008-02-01 20:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-11 19:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-01-30 9:28 ` [PATCH 2/9] libata: reorganize ata_port_operations Tejun Heo
2008-01-30 9:28 ` [PATCH 3/9] libata: implement and use ata_noop_irq_clear() Tejun Heo
2008-02-01 20:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-01-30 9:28 ` [PATCH 4/9] libata: normalize port_info, port_operations and sht tables Tejun Heo
2008-02-01 20:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-09 1:57 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-04 14:24 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-09 6:11 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-09 6:53 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-30 9:28 ` [PATCH 5/9] libata: implement and use SHT initializers and ops inheritance Tejun Heo
2008-01-30 17:09 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-31 3:39 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-31 4:04 ` Mark Lord
2008-01-31 4:12 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-01 20:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-02 0:06 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-30 9:29 ` [PATCH 6/9] make ata_pci_init_one() not use ops->irq_handler and pi->sht Tejun Heo
2008-01-30 9:29 ` [PATCH 7/9] libata: stop overloading port_info->private_data Tejun Heo
2008-02-04 14:26 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-09 2:07 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-01-30 9:29 ` [PATCH 8/9] libata: kill port_info->sht and ->irq_handler Tejun Heo
2008-01-30 9:29 ` [PATCH 9/9] libata: make reset related methods proper port operations Tejun Heo
2008-02-01 20:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-01-30 9:49 ` How to verify sht-ops-conversion patch doesn't change anything Tejun Heo
2008-01-30 9:51 ` GIT tree available Tejun Heo
2008-01-31 8:29 ` [PATCHSET libata-dev#upstream] clean up scsi_host_templates and ata_port_operations Akira Iguchi
2008-02-09 1:55 ` Tejun Heo
2008-01-31 8:34 ` Akira Iguchi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-11 12:05 [PATCHSET] libata: clean up scsi_host_templates and ata_port_operations, take #3 Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 12:06 ` [PATCH 7/9] libata: stop overloading port_info->private_data Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47AD0AD8.3020402@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=akira2.iguchi@toshiba.co.jp \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=domen.puncer@telargo.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=kngregertsen@norway.atmel.com \
--cc=leoli@freescale.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@dyn-67.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sonic.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).