From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Gabor FUNK <FUNK.Gabor@hunetkft.hu>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: JMicron - hard resetting link
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 08:50:34 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B230CA.9060506@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002f01c86d9c$94542f50$4d0fa8c0@M2007>
Hello,
Gabor FUNK wrote:
>> What I said was that timeouts occurring due to transmission errors
>> should be recoverable. It seems like IRQ delivery didn't work probably
>> due to screaming IRQ. I need to see the messages before the first
>> relevant error message. It's always a good idea to post full kernel log
>> from boot till failure. Things which don't seem relevant are often
>> relevant.
> Naturally. Full kern.log with boot:
> http://www.huweb.hu/maques/tmp/jmicron/kern.log
> (no edits, there are really only those 2 lines between Feb 6 and Feb 9's
> 1st exception)
Hmmm... Indeed. This is the first time this mode of failure is reported.
> Previously there was kernel 2.6.23.9 and I noticed the following in
> syslog by then:
> Feb 6 19:10:19 storage1 kernel: ata4: D2H reg with I during NCQ, this
> message won't be printed again
> Feb 6 19:10:20 storage1 kernel: ata1: D2H reg with I during NCQ, this
> message won't be printed again
> Feb 6 19:10:20 storage1 kernel: ata2: D2H reg with I during NCQ, this
> message won't be printed again
> Feb 6 19:10:21 storage1 kernel: ata3: D2H reg with I during NCQ, this
> message won't be printed again
>
> I googled and saw that there was some fixes related to this (maybe it
> was you), so that's why we hoped that 2.6.24 will fix this. Actually the
> above error messages were gone, but...
Yeap, those are gone.
>> Till now, none of this kind of problem has been tracked down to MB or
>> the controller while 90% of hardware problems turned out to be power
>> related.
> I'll put a brand new, probably different PSU in the case and put the MB
> and the 4 disks of the problematic controller on it, and put the 2 system
> and other 4 disks to this one (or even another one).
Yeap, please keep me posted.
> Meanwhile I'd welcome if you have any suggestion why controller reset
> causing a "fatal error"...
> BTW, the drives were accessible after the array broke (when I got there).
What do you mean by 'drives were accessible'? /dev/sdX nodes were
accessible?
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-12 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-12 9:48 JMicron - hard resetting link Gabor FUNK
2008-02-12 13:05 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-12 14:38 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-02-12 14:52 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-12 17:27 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-02-12 23:50 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-02-14 23:02 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-02-14 23:32 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-21 21:45 ` Gabor FUNK
2008-02-22 2:03 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-24 9:04 ` Gabor FUNK
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47B230CA.9060506@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=FUNK.Gabor@hunetkft.hu \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).