linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* sil3114 corruptions (was: Re: [PATCH 3/3] faster workaround)
@ 2008-02-13 10:12 Bernd Schubert
  2008-02-13 10:43 ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bernd Schubert @ 2008-02-13 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo, linux-ide

Hello Tejun,

On Tuesday 23 October 2007 10:08:01 you wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> >>> 2) Once we identified, over time, the set of drives affected by this
> >>> 3112 quirk (aka drives that didn't fully comply to SATA spec), the
> >>> debugging of corruption cases largely shifted to the standard
> >>> routine: update the BIOS, replace the
> >>> cables/RAM/power/mainboard/slot/etc. to be certain of problem location.
> >>
> >> Except for the continued series of later SI + Nvidia chipset (mostly)
> >> pattern which seems unanswered but also being later chips I assume
> >> unrelated to this problem.
> >
> > The SIL_FLAG_MOD15WRITE flag is set in sil_port_info[] is set according
> > to the best info we have from SiI, which indicates that 3114 and 3512 do
> > not have the same problem as the 3112.
>
> I don't think this data corruption problem w/ sil3114 is related to
> m15w.  m15w workaround slows down things quite a bit and is likely to
> hide problems on PCI bus side.  There are reports of data corruption
> with 3114 on nvidia (most common), via and now amd chipsets.  There's
> one on intel too but IIRC wasn't too definite.
>
> According to a user, freebsd didn't have data corruption problem on the
> same hardware.  I copied PCI FIFO setup code (ours is broken BTW) but it
> didn't fix the problem.
>
> I'll try to reproduce the problem locally and hunt it down.

the problem just came up here again, as you and Jeff already guessed also with 
the the workaround patches.
I guess you didn't find time to look into it yet? Is there anything I can do? 
What would you have done after reproducing it?


Thanks,
Bernd

-- 
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks GmbH

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: sil3114 corruptions (was: Re: [PATCH 3/3] faster workaround)
  2008-02-13 10:12 sil3114 corruptions (was: Re: [PATCH 3/3] faster workaround) Bernd Schubert
@ 2008-02-13 10:43 ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2008-02-13 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bernd Schubert; +Cc: linux-ide, Jeff Garzik

Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Hello Tejun,
> 
> On Tuesday 23 October 2007 10:08:01 you wrote:
>> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> Alan Cox wrote:
>>>>> 2) Once we identified, over time, the set of drives affected by this
>>>>> 3112 quirk (aka drives that didn't fully comply to SATA spec), the
>>>>> debugging of corruption cases largely shifted to the standard
>>>>> routine: update the BIOS, replace the
>>>>> cables/RAM/power/mainboard/slot/etc. to be certain of problem location.
>>>> Except for the continued series of later SI + Nvidia chipset (mostly)
>>>> pattern which seems unanswered but also being later chips I assume
>>>> unrelated to this problem.
>>> The SIL_FLAG_MOD15WRITE flag is set in sil_port_info[] is set according
>>> to the best info we have from SiI, which indicates that 3114 and 3512 do
>>> not have the same problem as the 3112.
>> I don't think this data corruption problem w/ sil3114 is related to
>> m15w.  m15w workaround slows down things quite a bit and is likely to
>> hide problems on PCI bus side.  There are reports of data corruption
>> with 3114 on nvidia (most common), via and now amd chipsets.  There's
>> one on intel too but IIRC wasn't too definite.
>>
>> According to a user, freebsd didn't have data corruption problem on the
>> same hardware.  I copied PCI FIFO setup code (ours is broken BTW) but it
>> didn't fix the problem.
>>
>> I'll try to reproduce the problem locally and hunt it down.
> 
> the problem just came up here again, as you and Jeff already guessed also with 
> the the workaround patches.
> I guess you didn't find time to look into it yet? Is there anything I can do? 
> What would you have done after reproducing it?

Jeff, any progress on testing?


-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-13 10:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-13 10:12 sil3114 corruptions (was: Re: [PATCH 3/3] faster workaround) Bernd Schubert
2008-02-13 10:43 ` Tejun Heo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).