From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enclosure: add support for enclosure services
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:49:35 -0500
Message-ID: <47B31F9F.7020009@emulex.com>
References: <875344.96222.qm@web31808.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	 <47B2F9C3.8070207@emulex.com>	 <1202918691.3109.18.camel@localhost.localdomain>	 <47B3194C.7070809@emulex.com> <1202921006.3109.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-To: James.Smart@Emulex.Com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1202921006.3109.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: ltuikov@yahoo.com, Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>, linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, jeff@garzik.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

James Bottomley wrote:
> ...  I wouldn't have bothered except that I could see ad-hoc
> in-kernel sysfs solutions beginning to appear.

If this is true, and if no one quickly volunteers to do the utility, then
I agree with what you are doing.

-- james s