linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: saeed bishara <saeed.bishara@gmail.com>
Cc: Saeed Bishara <saeed@marvell.com>,
	jeff@garzik.org, htejun@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	nico@cam.org, byron.bbradley@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sata_mv: remove iounmap in mv_platform_remove
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:40:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47B49938.8090709@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c70ff3ad0802141033g712be583p3d4a0269568803c6@mail.gmail.com>

saeed bishara wrote:
>>  Mmm.. sounds like a bug to me.  Possibly two bugs:
>>
>>  1. the ioremap() should fail if the range is already mapped, and
>>  2. we should free the resources on module unload.
>>
>>  I suppose this would be mostly automatic if the code simply
>>  were to use devm_ioremap() instead of ioremap().
> my understanding for the /proc/iomem was totaly wrong..
> the ioremap() actually allocated different address each time,
..

Good.  That makes a lot more sense.

> I don't know if should fail if the range is already mapped,
> but maybe the name (remap) hints that it is shouldn't.
> anyway, I replaced ioremap with devm_ioremap and it looks fine. I'll
> send the new patch in different email.
..

I think that the code should first call devm_request_region()
to reserve the ioports -- this will then fail if the ports are in-use.
After success there, it should then call devm_ioremap(),
which gives a virtual address back (the "remap" part) for use within the kernel.

Cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-14 19:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-13 21:09 [PATCH 1/2] sata_mv: use hpriv->base instead of the host->iomap Saeed Bishara
2008-02-13 21:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] sata_mv: remove iounmap in mv_platform_remove Saeed Bishara
2008-02-13 19:31   ` Mark Lord
2008-02-14 12:56     ` saeed bishara
2008-02-14 16:43       ` Mark Lord
2008-02-14 18:33         ` saeed bishara
2008-02-14 19:40           ` Mark Lord [this message]
2008-02-16 11:11     ` Martin Michlmayr
2008-02-16 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] sata_mv: use hpriv->base instead of the host->iomap Mark Lord
2008-02-20 17:09 ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47B49938.8090709@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=byron.bbradley@gmail.com \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@cam.org \
    --cc=saeed.bishara@gmail.com \
    --cc=saeed@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).