From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Johann-Christoph Jacob <johann-christoph.jacob@fhtw-berlin.de>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sata_sil24 not configuring drive right?
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:23:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BCD2A7.1030504@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47BC7D47.9060608@fhtw-berlin.de>
Johann-Christoph Jacob wrote:
> my problem is not with the transfer mode but with the NCQ queue_depth.
> My bootlog shows:
> ata1.00: 234441648 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 1)
> but i would like it to show:
> ata1.00: 234441648 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
> or something similar.
> I was not exact enough concerning the writeability of
> /sys/block/sda/device/queue_depth
> The file is not read only but writing to it fails:
> echo 31 > /sys/block/sda/device/queue_depth
> bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
Right.
>>> ATA device, with non-removable media
>>> Model Number: WDC WD1200BEVS-07LAT0
>>> Serial Number: WD-WXE906801963
>>> Firmware Revision: 01.06M01
>>> Standards:
>>> Supported: 7 6 5 4
>>> Likely used: 7
>>> Configuration:
>>> Logical max current
>>> cylinders 16383 16383
>>> heads 16 16
>>> sectors/track 63 63
>>> --
>>> CHS current addressable sectors: 16514064
>>> LBA user addressable sectors: 234441648
>>> LBA48 user addressable sectors: 234441648
>>> device size with M = 1024*1024: 114473 MBytes
>>> device size with M = 1000*1000: 120034 MBytes (120 GB)
>>> Capabilities:
>>> LBA, IORDY(can be disabled)
>>> Queue depth: 1
Hmm... Here it is. Interesting. The drive is reporting queue depth of
1. Interesting. This is the first time I see this. The drive is
telling libata that it supports NCQ and the max queue depth is 1 and
libata configures it accordingly. I'll ask wd about it.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-21 1:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <47BB8346.4070400@fhtw-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <47BBA66C.7050900@gmail.com>
2008-02-20 19:19 ` sata_sil24 not configuring drive right? Johann-Christoph Jacob
2008-02-21 1:23 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-02-21 6:53 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-21 12:26 ` Johann-Christoph Jacob
2008-02-20 19:16 Johann-Christoph Jacob
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-19 4:28 Theo Baumgartner
2007-07-03 6:38 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47BCD2A7.1030504@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=johann-christoph.jacob@fhtw-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).