From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Mark Mason <mason@postdiluvian.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: align shost->hostdata to cacheline
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:32:50 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BCE2D2.5030506@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1203101837.3058.34.camel@localhost.localdomain>
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 07:49 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 18:48 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> shost->hostdata can contain arbitrary data including DMA target
>>>> buffers. Align it to cacheline.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> James, what do you think?
>>> Hmm, it will blow out the host size ... although that's not such a huge
>>> problem since there are relatively few of them in most running kernels.
>>> What's the actual use case for this, though? The host structure is
>>> allocated in ordinary memory ... we don't make sure it's DMAable, and
>>> most HBAs that want to use memory for mailboxes need coherent memory
>>> anyway.
>> "As it can contain arbitrary structure, it should follow the largest
>> meaningful alignment to allow the contained structure proper alignment."
>> is the logic. I think it's generally RTTD for inline private data but
>> feel free to disagree.
>
> Well, the way we usually do that is to have the host float the alignment
> if necessary. The problem with relying on __cacheline_aligned for an
> allocated structure is that it only works if the allocated structure
> actually begins on a cacheline. Kmalloc (which is where we get the host
> from) doesn't necessarily obey this if certain slab debugging flags are
> present.
Hmmm... Right. That means libata either needs to create a separate slab
for the sector buf or align it after allocating by itself. Eeeek.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-21 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-12 18:02 libata/sata_sil24 cache alignment problem? Mark Mason
2008-02-12 22:12 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-12 23:36 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-13 2:13 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-13 2:32 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-13 18:47 ` Mark Mason
2008-02-13 20:21 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-13 21:25 ` Mark Mason
2008-02-14 0:21 ` Alan Cox
2008-02-14 3:05 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-14 9:44 ` [PATCH] libata: align ap->sector_buf to cacheline Tejun Heo
2008-02-14 9:48 ` [PATCH] scsi: align shost->hostdata " Tejun Heo
2008-02-14 15:05 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-14 22:49 ` Tejun Heo
2008-02-15 18:57 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-21 2:32 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-02-13 18:51 ` libata/sata_sil24 cache alignment problem? Mark Mason
2008-02-12 23:25 ` Thomas Evans
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47BCE2D2.5030506@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@postdiluvian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).