From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: new ata_port_operations for .pmp_{read,write} ? Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:14:21 -0500 Message-ID: <47C1194D.7080601@pobox.com> References: <4730E312.3090900@navy.mil> <4737C16E.3070607@gmail.com> <4738827D.9060405@pobox.com> <4738F935.1000708@gmail.com> <47BC798F.6070900@pobox.com> <47BE17CA.6060406@rtr.ca> <47BE1833.9090501@rtr.ca> <47BE2C0C.3020801@gmail.com> <47BE2DBD.9010704@rtr.ca> <47BE2F9E.5040206@gmail.com> <47BE32B5.5020300@rtr.ca> <47BE3325.8060209@rtr.ca> <47BE4701.2030104@rtr.ca> <47BE4DFE.2030407@rtr.ca> <47BEDAF2.8000301@rtr.ca> <47BFAC06.5030805@rtr.ca> <47C116D4.1090600@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:44977 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750770AbYBXHO0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:14:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47C116D4.1090600@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Mark Lord , IDE/ATA development list , Saeed Bishara Tejun Heo wrote: > Yeah, exactly. I think what needs to be done is to separate out SFF > assumptions from core layer, factor out SFF-proper helpers and use them > to implement LLDs for quasi-SFF controllers. Thinking long term, I continue to hope that SFF support can eventually be separate into a sub-API, allowing people to disable (at compile time) SFF support completely if they don't need it. Jeff