From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Sata-MV, Intergated Sata Device Support Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:17:09 -0500 Message-ID: <47C35A85.3020307@garzik.org> References: <1176673884.5109.30.camel@Desktop> <47C35203.20402@garzik.org> <47C3585D.8070701@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47C3585D.8070701@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jon@ngndg.com, LKML , Saeed Bishara List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Mark Lord wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Jon Li wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am curious as to whether there are plans to add support for integrated >>> sata devices. I personally want to add support for a 60x1C0 based >>> device (pci:id = 0x5182). I think adding support should be relatively >>> simple, except for a few issues outlined below. >>> >>> In the original mvSata.c (ver3.4) that has 0x5182 support, the config >>> space is as such: >>> >>> case MV_SATA_DEVICE_ID_5182: >>> pAdapter->numberOfChannels = MV_SATA_5182_PORT_NUM; >>> pAdapter->numberOfUnits = 1; >>> pAdapter->portsPerUnit = 2; >>> pAdapter->sataAdapterGeneration = MV_SATA_GEN_IIE; >>> /*The integrated sata core chip based on 60x1 C0*/ >>> pAdapter->chipIs60X1C0 = MV_TRUE; >>> pAdapter->hostInterface = MV_HOST_IF_INTEGRATED; >>> pAdapter->mainMaskOffset = 0x20024; /*the iobaseaddress is >>> 0x60000*/ >>> pAdapter->mainCauseOffset = 0x20020; >>> break; >>> >>> I have not yet figured out how all these values are defined in sata-mv.c >>> (ver 0.8). Specifically, where do I define "numberOfChannels" which >>> should equal 2, and "numberOfUnits" which obviously equals 1? >>> >>> I have a current config space (not completed) for sata-mv.c which is: >>> >>> { /* chip_5182 */ >>> .sht = &mv_sht, >>> .flags = (MV_COMMON_FLAGS | MV_6XXX_FLAGS | >>> MV_FLAG_DUAL_HC), >>> .pio_mask = 0x1f, /* pio0-4 */ >>> .udma_mask = 0x7f, /* udma0-6 */ >>> .port_ops = &mv6_ops, >>> }, > ... > > Saeed: isn't this what your SOC patches already implemented for us? > As near as I can tell, sata_mv now already has support for the 60x1C0. Saeed's stuff didn't support PCI though, and Jon Li is definitely talking about PCI... Jeff