From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: Sata-MV, Intergated Sata Device Support Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:55:01 -0500 Message-ID: <47C43655.1050907@rtr.ca> References: <1176673884.5109.30.camel@Desktop> <47C35203.20402@garzik.org> <47C3585D.8070701@rtr.ca> <47C35A85.3020307@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([76.10.145.34]:3485 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754027AbYBZPwF (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:52:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: saeed Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, jon@ngndg.com, LKML saeed wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>> ... >>> >>> Saeed: isn't this what your SOC patches already implemented for us? >>> As near as I can tell, sata_mv now already has support for the 60x1C0. >> Saeed's stuff didn't support PCI though, and Jon Li is definitely talking >> about PCI... > yes, my patch added support for the SoC sata like in the 5182, and this > is what Jon Li was concerned about. he mentioneded the 60x1C0 pci device > just to suggest to use it's code for the SoC sata as it is very similar. .. I don't think I understand your english there. Does the current sata_mv driver work as-is with the chipset this person wants? If not, then exactly what has to change to make it work? Thanks