From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: fix residual byte count handling Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:40:05 +0900 Message-ID: <47CD18F5.4050705@gmail.com> References: <20080304175302T.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080304085944.GG6704@kernel.dk> <20080304180648W.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080304182228Z.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20080304093536.GH6704@kernel.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080304093536.GH6704@kernel.dk> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , tomof@acm.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, efault@gmx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, bzolnier@gmail.com List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > Looks excellent to me, has a variant of this been tested as OK by the > users reporting the regression? Yeah, the other version which added extra_len to data_len has been verified to work. The only difference is now libata is adding extra_len, so this one should be safe. -- tejun