From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: sam song <sam_song@usish.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Issuing a vendor specific ATA cmd on SATA Disk via ATA Pass Thru
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:21:30 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D5FABA.6040201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <008601c88326$753395d0$5239a8c0@usish.com.cn>
sam song wrote:
> Dear Tejun,
>
>> sam song wrote:
>>> Still one puzzle to consult with you. As you mentioned, the ATA Pass
> Thru in
>>> SELS10 2.6.16.21-0.8 is "broken". So what is the workable vanilla kernel
>>> besides 2.6.23.X? I
>>> need to have more choice on distribution. For example 2.6.18.X vanilla
>>> kernel with your patch can work?
>> Well. libata has been developing pretty fast. I think post 2.6.20
>> should be fine but not too sure. Does anyone remember better?
>
> Until now, I have confirmed that the following kernel can support the
> special long time command after applied your patch in block/scsi_ioctl.c.
>
> RHEL4.5 - 2.6.9-55
> RHEL5 - 2.6.18-8
> Vanilla kernel 2.6.23
>
> I saw your patch in the main tree already. Actually, the key change workable
> for me is the following piece - timeout only.
>
> diff --git a/block/scsi_ioctl.c b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
> index 91c7322..9675b34 100644
> --- a/block/scsi_ioctl.c
> +++ b/block/scsi_ioctl.c
> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int blk_fill_sghdr_rq(struct request_queue *q,
> struct request *rq,
> rq->cmd_len = hdr->cmd_len;
> rq->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC;
>
> - rq->timeout = (hdr->timeout * HZ) / 1000;
> + rq->timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(hdr->timeout);
> if (!rq->timeout)
> rq->timeout = q->sg_timeout;
> if (!rq->timeout)
>
> FYI.
Great, thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-11 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-29 10:34 Issuing a vendor specific ATA cmd on SATA Disk via ATA Pass Thru sam song
2007-11-30 1:18 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-30 3:33 ` sam song
2007-11-30 6:12 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-30 6:29 ` sam song
2007-11-30 6:33 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-30 6:42 ` sam song
2007-11-30 6:47 ` Tejun Heo
2007-11-30 7:01 ` sam song
2007-11-30 8:22 ` Tejun Heo
2007-12-03 10:20 ` sam song
2007-12-04 0:46 ` Tejun Heo
2007-12-04 1:32 ` sam song
2007-12-04 2:21 ` Tejun Heo
2007-12-05 1:43 ` Tejun Heo
2007-12-05 2:39 ` sam song
2007-12-05 3:16 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-11 3:17 ` sam song
2008-03-11 3:21 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D5FABA.6040201@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam_song@usish.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).