From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: 2.6.24.X: SATA/AHCI related boot delay. - not with 2.6.24.3 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:26:23 +0900 Message-ID: <47E087DF.7070101@gmail.com> References: <200803091922.33083.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <200803181159.48327.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <47DFBBE2.7050304@gmail.com> <200803181433.12584.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.190]:23930 "EHLO rn-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932898AbYCSUXx (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:23:53 -0400 Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id v46so545220rnb.15 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:23:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200803181433.12584.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Volker Armin Hemmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Dienstag, 18. M=E4rz 2008, Tejun Heo wrote: >> failed message on reboots). >> >>> Of course, I booted and rebooted several times. And it stays. >>> >>> Maybe it is the hardware. But I replaced the cables already and sma= rt >>> says the disk is ok. >> Does the attached patch make any difference? >=20 > patching file drivers/ata/ahci.c > Hunk #1 succeeded at 397 (offset -5 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 1819 (offset -45 lines). It's okay. It's because I was lazy and generated the patch against devel tree. > built&booted, same results as allways. With non-raid setting, IDENTIF= Y error=20 > on cold boot and sofreset error on reboot: > (with patch, without nosmi): Oh... I see. I made a mistake. In ahci.c, what I intended was making ahci_softreset NULL not ahci_hardreset. Can you please change that and test again? --=20 tejun