From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: What to do about the 2TB limit on HDIO_GETGEO ? Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:57:55 -0700 Message-ID: <47EB2953.4070301@zytor.com> References: <20080327035257.GB9566@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:35812 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751361AbYC0FAU (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 01:00:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080327035257.GB9566@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>, Randy Dunlap , Mark Lord , Jens Axboe , Jeff Garzik , Tejun Heo , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , IDE/ATA development list , linux-scsi Greg KH wrote: >> So e.g. lilo should depend on sysfs and *a*special*configuration* of udev, >> while the admin MUST NOT use mknod'ed device files nor manually create >> symlinks pointing to them, and not use relative path names? >> That's plain stupid. > > If sysfs is stupid, then use an ioctl, have I objected to that? I think he's objecting to the dependency on udev configuration, not to sysfs. -hpa