From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: Need help understanding SATA error message. Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:50:31 -0400 Message-ID: <47EDBC87.8090109@rtr.ca> References: <47ED136F.9010501@rtr.ca> <47ED15D2.3080403@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from rtr.ca ([76.10.145.34]:2886 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752533AbYC2Duc (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:50:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tomas Lund Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Tomas Lund wrote: > On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Mark Lord wrote: > >> Mark Lord wrote: >> >> Duh.. actually, we were just discussing this very error in another >> thread. The drive is really telling us that it hit an unrecoverable >> WRITE error at sector 0a:24:f9 on the drive. Bad sector. > > Aha, ok :( > >> There are patches queued up for 2.6.26 to automatically resume the >> cache flush after the failed sector, but you'll still lose data at >> that sector. > > Lucky for me, there is no data yet on the system yet! > >> Time for a low-level reformat, if the manufacturer has a utility for >> that. Otherwise, RMA it. > > The drive is brand spanking new, less than 3 weeks, its going back! > > I do however wonder, what is an "unrecoverable write error", does it > mean it even failed to re-allocate it? Reallocated_Sector_Ct is still 0 > according to smartcl... .. Mmm.. it does seem rather unlikely there, doesn't it ? One thing to try, if you have 12000 seconds to spare, :) is to simply try this: cat /dev/zero > /dev/sdX sync hdparm -F /dev/sdX And see if that completes without error. If it does, then the drive may be fine. Software bugs are always possible, but do seem unlikely in this case. But then, so does a hardware failure seem unlikely on a new drive. Cheers