From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Cc: IDE/ATA development list <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sata_mv clean up mv_stop_edma usage
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:59:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F2E88E.4000401@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F17510.7060902@rtr.ca>
Hello, Mark.
Mark Lord wrote:
> - /* now properly wait for the eDMA to stop */
> - for (i = 1000; i > 0; i--) {
> - reg = readl(port_mmio + EDMA_CMD_OFS);
> + /* Wait for the chip to confirm eDMA is off. */
> + for (i = 10000; i > 0; i--) {
> + u32 reg = readl(port_mmio + EDMA_CMD_OFS);
> if (!(reg & EDMA_EN))
> - break;
> -
> - udelay(100);
> - }
> -
> - if (reg & EDMA_EN) {
> - ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_ERR, "Unable to stop eDMA\n");
> - err = -EIO;
> + return 0;
> + udelay(10);
Unless the hardware calls for really short polling interval, I think
it's generally better to limit polling with jiffies and using msleep()
instead of delays.
Also, mv_stop_edma() skips actual operation if EDMA_EN isn't set, which
I think is the correct way to do it in hot paths but I think it's better
to stop the edma engine unconditionally prior to reset as that's where
we try to bring the controller back into senses.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-02 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-31 23:27 [PATCH 0/5] sata_mv cleanups Mark Lord
2008-03-31 23:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] sata_mv cosmetic fixes Mark Lord
2008-04-04 7:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-31 23:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] sata_mv clean up mv_stop_edma usage Mark Lord
2008-04-02 1:59 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-04-02 19:33 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-02 19:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-02 19:47 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-03 0:47 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-04 7:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-31 23:35 ` [PATCH 3/5] sata_mv fix ifctl handling Mark Lord
2008-03-31 23:35 ` [PATCH 4/5] sata_mv new mv_sata_hardreset handler Mark Lord
2008-04-02 2:31 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-02 19:33 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-02 19:51 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-03 0:49 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-03 2:48 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-03 3:15 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-03 14:01 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-03 14:04 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-03 14:09 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-03 14:21 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-03 14:35 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-03 15:05 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-03 14:05 ` Tejun Heo
2008-03-31 23:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] sata_mv remove mv_phy_reset and mv_postreset Mark Lord
2008-04-04 8:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-04 14:25 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-11 0:21 ` [PATCH] sata_mv rework hardreset sequence Mark Lord
2008-04-16 1:17 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F2E88E.4000401@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).