From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sata_mv new mv_sata_hardreset handler Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:09:52 +0900 Message-ID: <47F4E530.5040901@gmail.com> References: <47F1736F.8020104@rtr.ca> <47F1755F.9000303@rtr.ca> <47F2F002.9070401@gmail.com> <47F3E3A8.10309@rtr.ca> <47F429B0.7020204@gmail.com> <47F44572.5010100@rtr.ca> <47F44BCB.7030005@gmail.com> <47F4E341.9080609@rtr.ca> <47F4E3E4.5080706@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.228]:37518 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752865AbYDCOKA (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:10:00 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c48so2321154wra.1 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 07:09:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <47F4E3E4.5080706@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: IDE/ATA development list , Jeff Garzik Mark Lord wrote: > Though, mind you.. as soon as your rework *does* hit upstream, > I'll happily submit further sata_mv patches to take full advantage. > > The less custom code in sata_mv in the end, the happier I'll be. > That's why there's a comment there right now reminding me of it. Yeap, I fully agree. Also, the said change will probably go into 2.6.26 too. It's unfortunate that your sata_mv work overlaps too much with recent API overhauls. I don't know how Jeff will merge stuff but merging sata_mv changes first is fine by me. I'll update API changes accordingly and run it by you. Thanks. -- tejun