From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] block: add large command support
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:08:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4805C209.6040606@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080416083305.GY12774@kernel.dk>
On Wed, Apr 16 2008 at 11:33 +0300, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:50:54 +0200
>> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Monday 14 April 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Apr 14 2008, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>>>> This patch changes rq->cmd from the static array to a pointer to
>>>>> support large commands.
>>>>>
>>>>> We rarely handle large commands. So for optimization, a struct request
>>>>> still has a static array for a command. rq_init sets rq->cmd pointer
>>>>> to the static array.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
>>>>> Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> block/blk-core.c | 1 +
>>>>> drivers/ide/ide-io.c | 1 +
>>>>> include/linux/blkdev.h | 12 ++++++++++--
>>>>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>>>>> index 6669238..6f0968f 100644
>>>>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>>>>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>>>>> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
>>>>> rq->errors = 0;
>>>>> rq->ref_count = 1;
>>>>> rq->cmd_len = 0;
>>>>> + rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
>>>>> memset(rq->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB);
>>>>> rq->data_len = 0;
>>>>> rq->extra_len = 0;
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>>>>> index 7153796..bac5ea1 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
>>>>> @@ -1595,6 +1595,7 @@ void ide_init_drive_cmd (struct request *rq)
>>>>> {
>>>>> memset(rq, 0, sizeof(*rq));
>>>>> rq->ref_count = 1;
>>>>> + rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
>>>>> }
>>> Tomo, some more changes are needed:
>>>
>>> Please think about all _static_/dynamic allocations of 'struct request'
>>> used together with REQ_TYPE_SPECIAL etc., i.e.
>> I think that using struct request allocated statically is wrong from
>> the perspective of the block layer design, that is, you always need to
>> use blk_get_request. I think that except ide, everyone does.
>>
>> I try to convert ide to use blk_get_request properly if you want.
>
> That would be best, but the on-stack allocation has the benefit that
> it'll always work. So until we can completely get rid of that, lets just
> make it a hard rule that ANY rq allocation MUST call rq_init(). It's a
> lot saner than doing a memset() anyway.
>
Just a patch that I had for ages since the bad old request bidi times,
perhaps is also good today. (rebased to for-2.6.26 branch)
---
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:05:33 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Initialize all members of struct request in rq_init
Before, every member added/removed from struct request would entitle a change
to rq_init, for initialization. Now all members are default to zero and only
the none zero members are specifically initialized.
Users that need requests on the stack or pre-allocated, must call rq_init()
before use.
Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 22 ++--------------------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 6f0968f..3f4c563 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -113,36 +113,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_get_backing_dev_info);
*/
void rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
{
+ memset(rq, 0, sizeof(*rq));
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->queuelist);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rq->donelist);
rq->q = q;
rq->sector = rq->hard_sector = (sector_t) -1;
- rq->nr_sectors = rq->hard_nr_sectors = 0;
- rq->current_nr_sectors = rq->hard_cur_sectors = 0;
- rq->bio = rq->biotail = NULL;
INIT_HLIST_NODE(&rq->hash);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&rq->rb_node);
- rq->rq_disk = NULL;
- rq->nr_phys_segments = 0;
- rq->nr_hw_segments = 0;
- rq->ioprio = 0;
- rq->special = NULL;
- rq->buffer = NULL;
rq->tag = -1;
- rq->errors = 0;
rq->ref_count = 1;
- rq->cmd_len = 0;
rq->cmd = rq->__cmd;
- memset(rq->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB);
- rq->data_len = 0;
- rq->extra_len = 0;
- rq->sense_len = 0;
- rq->data = NULL;
- rq->sense = NULL;
- rq->end_io = NULL;
- rq->end_io_data = NULL;
- rq->next_rq = NULL;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rq_init);
static void req_bio_endio(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio,
unsigned int nbytes, int error)
--
1.5.3.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-16 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080414010112W.tomof@acm.org>
[not found] ` <1208170266-1676-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
[not found] ` <1208170266-1676-2-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
[not found] ` <1208170266-1676-3-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
2008-04-14 10:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: replace sizeof(rq->cmd) with BLK_MAX_CDB FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 10:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: add large command support FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 11:29 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-14 12:08 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-15 22:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-15 22:57 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-16 0:22 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-16 8:33 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-16 9:08 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2008-04-16 9:42 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-16 22:28 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 3:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-17 7:07 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-17 11:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 11:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-17 12:07 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-17 4:02 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-14 14:41 ` Pete Wyckoff
2008-04-14 22:33 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-15 13:44 ` Pete Wyckoff
2008-04-15 7:45 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-04-15 10:05 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-04-15 7:29 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4805C209.6040606@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).